Friday, 8 May 2009

"Baroness of Bethnal Green" is helped by the useful prevarication of the 'Spitalfields Housing Association'

0525 UK London Friday 8 May 2009


The following headline [“Labour peer faces eviction”] to a story published this week by INSIDE HOUSING is inaccurate. A read of the contents exposes the truth.

That the Spitalfields Housing Association that owns the Wapping House is not all that bothered about any of the 'deeds' of Pola Uddin.

We produce the item as a reference here and we promise to answer all the questions that have arisen about Pola Uddin's achievements.


Labour peer faces eviction

Labour peer faces eviction
08/05/2009 | By Clara Story
Print
Email
Share
Save
Housing association probes Baroness Uddin’s second home status over possible breach of tenancy

A Labour peer is being investigated and could face eviction after naming her housing association property as her second home.

Baroness Uddin, a tenant of Spitalfields Housing Association in east London, claimed in her House of Lords expenses for 2007/08 that her main residence was a flat in Kent.

She claimed £29,675 a year for overnight subsistence - the allowance for residency at a second home in London - in the same year.

But legally a tenant with an assured or secure tenancy must live in the social home as their ‘only or principal home’, meaning she could have breached her tenancy. Baroness Uddin is understood to share a joint tenancy on the home with her husband.

Although last year’s claim was the first in which she named the location of her main residence, Baroness Uddin has been claiming between £15,000 and £24,000 each year for overnight subsistence since 2001.

Asked whether Baroness Uddin faced eviction Omar Mapara, chief executive of Spitalfields Housing Association, said the association ‘is investigating this matter which it takes very seriously’.

‘We have written to her requesting that she confirms that she and her husband continue to occupy our property as their only or principal home and we await a response,’ he added.

Avril Smith, senior lawyer at Lawrence Graham, said: ‘If she maintains that the Maidstone property is her principal residence, she could fall into difficulty with her tenancy.’

Ms Smith confirmed the ultimate sanction available for the breach of a tenancy agreement could be the loss of the tenancy.

If the tenancy is joint with her husband, she could claim it was his main residence only, which could comply with the rules, Ms Smith added.

The baroness became the first Muslim woman life peer in 1998. She is named as a company director of business and management consultancy Manzil Associates.

Baroness Uddin said she welcomed the review of her expenses that will be carried out by the clerk of Parliament. She said she had not broken the rules of the House of Lords and would not comment further until the review was finished.

Have your say


Required fields | Terms and conditions

Please do not complete the following form field for security reasons.
Name
E-mail
Comment
Your name will display with your comment, but feel free to use a pseudonym. Email addresses are not displayed.

Comments are moderated before they appear on the site, so there may be a delay between a comment being posted and it going live.

I have read and agree to the terms and conditions
Print
Email
Share

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Poverty of the MPs is in the grotesque shamelessness... and petty greed

Poverty of the MPs is in the grotesque shamelessness... and petty greed
EAST LONDON PRESS says at 0510 Hrs on Tuesday 31 March 2009: It is not just Harry Cohen, the east London MP who used to flaunt a faker beard and spout strings of calculated socialistic confections... Having lost BOTH in order to stay on the bandwagon, Cohen seems to have also lost any sense of rationality. And dignity. How else could he be saying those things, comparing himself to Churchill in that way? There were indeed many flaws in Churchill’s life and character. But Harry Cohen is not remotely convincing as a comparable Member of Parliament...Or as a member of society... What Cohen’s banal boast tells us about him is that he belongs to a parliament of political, mental, moral pigmies with no evident shame...

Followers

Blog Archive