0500 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday
1 July 2009
EAST LONDON PRESS asks: What IS 'George Galloway’s Party on Tower Hamlets Council' about? Is it 'still a separate Party' or is it an extension of...?
This question has been forced by the events of the past month which has witnessed the many statements, public and not so public, about the Tower Hamlets Council’s ‘town clerk’, Martin Smith.
Most of the running in the ‘story’ has been done by the Conservatives. Nothing original has originated from the ‘George Galloway party’ on the Council.
EAST LONDON PRESS is not speculating when stating the fact that ‘former’ members of Tower Hamlets Council Respect group, like Shahed Ali, are on the record as having acted in concert with Abjol Miah, the ‘leader’ of ‘Respect’ on the Council to back the interests of elements allegedly associated with the ‘Bangladeshi’ ‘media’ in London .
And the same ‘leader’ of ‘Respect’ group on Tower Hamlets Council has been involved in the appointment of Lutfur Rahman ‘Ali’ to the Council, a ‘result’ that has been sought by the ‘Bengali’ group, for years.
Read the references to and also the distinction between ‘Bangladesh’ and ‘Bengali’ as very significant in context and historically. Even electorally.
Indeed, the public statements by ‘Abjol Miah’, shortly after the 4 May 2006 council election at which Miah became a councillor for the first time ever, have included a very clear line that has included a series of proactive assertions demanding the employment of ‘minority ethnic personnel’ to the Council.
On the face of it, that ‘sentiment’ may appear not only innocuous but also in accord with the received and the establishment line in Britain about ‘Diversity’.
So why is EAST LONDON PRESS asking the question?
The answer is that ‘George Galloway’ is still claiming to be separate from the Party of Blair and Bush that expelled him.
Yet the Tower Hamlets Council is very much in the grip of that Party’s undemocratic elements and influences and in the actual policy behaviour, the Council has got away with no mentionable opposition at all from the ‘Councillors from the Party of George Galloway’.
EAST LONDON PRESS is not speculating either about another ‘defection’ from the remaining group of the ‘George Galloway’ ‘party’ councillors. What we ARE doing is asking: what is the political point for the people of this part of EAST LONDON of there being these councillors claiming to be of a ‘different’ ‘political’ party than the Blair and Brown party?
EAST LONDON PRESS is very aware of the fictitious flurry of letters being allegedly written by more than one of those councillors. We do not publish to embarrass anyone. We publish to tell the truth on what is going on. So please Mr *******, do not issue another series of ‘letters’ and ‘comments’ in the names of the different councillors!
What Mr Backdoorandfrontdoor and other real leaders of the propaganda and policy in the ‘George Galloway’ ‘party’ have to do is to consider what it is that they are doing on the Council.
Collecting internal information about Tower Hamlets Council may be a desirable objective. But doing so by abandoning political opposition is not something that may attract the voting behaviour of the people who matter albeit only on one single day every 4 years!
EAST LONDON PRESS can foresee a very public disappointment may be in the offing for the people and the community.
We do not give a date.
We observe events…
And report them.
WATCH THIS SPACE
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Poverty of the MPs is in the grotesque shamelessness... and petty greed
EAST LONDON PRESS says at 0510 Hrs on Tuesday 31 March 2009: It is not just Harry Cohen, the east London MP who used to flaunt a faker beard and spout strings of calculated socialistic confections... Having lost BOTH in order to stay on the bandwagon, Cohen seems to have also lost any sense of rationality. And dignity. How else could he be saying those things, comparing himself to Churchill in that way? There were indeed many flaws in Churchill’s life and character. But Harry Cohen is not remotely convincing as a comparable Member of Parliament...Or as a member of society... What Cohen’s banal boast tells us about him is that he belongs to a parliament of political, mental, moral pigmies with no evident shame...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.